![]() ![]() Back then, I think we saw the same things. I think that if they took the amount of effort that they're putting on building security products for revenue-generating purposes, and they put it into actually solving for vulnerabilities, improving their own product security - we would all be in a much, much better place.Įven before Microsoft came into endpoint security, in earnest, I was saying the same thing. I think their strategy doesn't serve the security industry, and security, period. In terms of Microsoft, how do you see its growing focus on its own security business impacting the cybersecurity industry? We also have a complete data analytics with nearly 400 customers. So we play in three different within security. Then we also have identity protection, which comes off the back of the acquisition that we just did of Attivo Networks. But we also have cloud workload protection as an adjacent surface in the enterprise. Then we apply artificial intelligence or machine learning to create real-time responses that are based on algorithms, not based on humans trying to sift through alerts.Įndpoint protection is obviously our core market. We knew it could only happen on the back of monitoring every workload in the enterprise environment, and we started with endpoints. If you look at what we do differently - which goes back to our roots - it’s that we wanted to build a fully autonomous platform that would actually detect and disrupt attackers in real time, with no human intervention. They're out there with solid products, solid offerings. In the endpoint market, clearly it’s Microsoft and CrowdStrike. Who do you see as your main competitors at this stage, and what is your biggest differentiator from them? You’ve been a public company for more than a year now. This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and brevity. He also spoke about the growing enterprise acceptance of AI/ML for security, the central role of extended detection and response (XDR) and why ransomware is more solvable than many realize. In an interview with Protocol, Weingarten weighed in on Google's eventual deal to acquire Mandiant. That combination would have raised questions about whether Microsoft would prioritize the use of its own endpoint security tools by Mandiant, potentially complicating SentinelOne’s relationship with Mandiant just as it was getting off the ground. On the same day that SentinelOne announced a partnership with prominent incident response provider Mandiant, Bloomberg reported that Microsoft was in acquisition talks with the cybersecurity powerhouse. The company got some potentially unhelpful news in February, though. There are indications SentinelOne is gaining ground in the endpoint security market faster than any major vendor. Its initial public offering last year, meanwhile, valued the company at $8.9 billion and remains the largest cybersecurity IPO ever. Revenue surged by 109% during the cybersecurity and data analytics vendor’s latest quarter, reaching $78.3 million - a pretty nice growth rate for a nearly decade-old, publicly traded company. While still a small player in endpoint security compared to rivals CrowdStrike and Microsoft, SentinelOne is a challenger they can’t ignore. For a company on a growth tear like SentinelOne, the fact that Google, and not Microsoft, will be acquiring one of its major partners is just one of the things that co-founder and CEO Tomer Weingarten counts as a blessing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |